Benjamin Denis Alarcon vs Mason Foxman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Jun at 09:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Denis Alarcon vs M. Foxman

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Alarcon 1 - 0 Foxman
They have played 2 sets in total, with Benjamin Denis Alarcon winning 2 and Mason Foxman winning 0. The last match between Benjamin Denis Alarcon and Mason Foxman was at the M25+H Ajaccio, 30-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Benjamin Denis Alarcon getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alarcon | 1 |
| Foxman | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25+H Ajaccio(06-30-25)
B. D. Alarcon vs M. Foxman H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 33.33% (47-94) | Career Total W/L | 11.76% (2-15) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. D. Alarcon vs M. Foxman Match Preview:
- How does Foxman perform on second serves? Foxman has secured 35.53% of points on second serve in the last 6 months, while Alarcon hasn't won any points, suggesting a significant advantage for Foxman in this area.
- In return games, Foxman wins 43.04% of opponents' second serve points compared to Alarcon’s 0%, providing Foxman an edge in breaking serve.
- Under pressure, Foxman saves 25% of breakpoints, whereas Alarcon saves none, indicating better resilience under duress for Foxman.
- Considering match win rates over the past year, Foxman has won 20% of matches, while Alarcon has a slightly higher rate at 28.57%.
- On hard courts, Alarcon performs better, winning 40% more matches compared to Foxman’s 20% win rate on the same surface.
- Both players frequently play in Futures/ITF $10K tournaments, with Alarcon having a slight advantage in win percentage (28.57% vs. 20%).
- Alarcon has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 38.67 compared to Foxman’s 158.8, suggesting Alarcon's experience at higher levels.
- In matches needing a deciding set, Foxman boasts a 100% win rate, whereas Alarcon wins only 25%, potentially favoring Foxman in tighter matches.
- Breakpoint conversion rates in recent form highlight Foxman's 33.33% success versus Alarcon’s 0%, which might prove crucial during key moments of the match.
Editorial Prediction (June 30, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating their recent performances, Foxman's excellent second serve game and effective return capability create a strong foundation for match dominance over Alarcon. While Alarcon may handle higher-ranked opponents, Foxman's better breakpoint conversion and ability to perform under pressure set him apart.
Despite Alarcon having a better hard court win rate and facing tougher competition, the deciding set statistics strongly favor Foxman, suggesting greater mental fortitude in critical moments.
The combination of statistics and recent trends leans toward Foxman having an edge in the upcoming match, making him the likely winner.
Benjamin Denis Alarcon vs Mason Foxman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. D. Alarcon vs M. Foxman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:31:57 | Average Match Time | 1:31:57 |
| 59% (34/58) | 1st Serve % | 60% (39/65) |
| 82% (28/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (23/39) |
| 54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (15/26) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 42% (27/65) | Return Points Win % | 29% (17/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. D. Alarcon Recent Matches Played
M. Foxman Recent Matches Played

B. D. Alarcon vs M. Foxman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.33% (47/94) | YTD Win/Loss | 11.76% (2/15) |
| 36.22% (113/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 13.89% (5/31) |
| 43.79% (1233/1583) | Games Win/Loss | 29.97% (86/201) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 32.84% (44/90) | Clay Win/Loss | 10.00% (1/9) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 10 | Aces Total | 10 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.44 |
| 66 | Total Double Faults | 62 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 129.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 88.71 |
| 70% (1329/1901) | 1st Serve % | 57% (287/505) |
| 54% (722/1329) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (162/287) |
| 42% (239/572) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (92/218) |
| 45% (70/154) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (9/30) |
| 39% (649/1662) | Return Points Win % | 33% (147/450) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (46/92) | Futures W/L | 11.76% (2/15) |
| 32% (45/139) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 13% (2/16) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 39% (7/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (10/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 84% (49/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 16% (49/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 7% (92/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (14/0) |